Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion #4644

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

irevoire
Copy link
Member

@irevoire irevoire commented May 20, 2024

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

@irevoire irevoire added this to the v1.9.0 milestone May 20, 2024
@irevoire irevoire changed the title Revert "Stream documents" Revert "Stream documents" but keep heed updated May 20, 2024
@irevoire irevoire requested a review from Kerollmops May 20, 2024 13:19
@irevoire irevoire changed the title Revert "Stream documents" but keep heed updated Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion May 20, 2024
@irevoire irevoire marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 13:27
Copy link
Member

@Kerollmops Kerollmops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you very much for the investigation and different integration tests. It was, in fact, quite hard to know that it would be breaking in advance.
bors merge

meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
4644: Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion r=Kerollmops a=irevoire

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 20, 2024

Build failed:

  • Tests on windows-2022

@curquiza
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@curquiza curquiza added the skip changelog The PR will not appear in the release changelogs label May 20, 2024
meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
4644: Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion r=curquiza a=irevoire

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 20, 2024

Build failed:

  • Tests on windows-2022

@irevoire
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
4644: Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion r=irevoire a=irevoire

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 20, 2024

Build failed:

@curquiza
Copy link
Member

bors merge

meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
4644: Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion r=curquiza a=irevoire

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 20, 2024

Build failed:

@curquiza
Copy link
Member

bors merge

pliiiiiiiiz

meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
4644: Revert "Stream documents" and keep heed+arroy to the latest verion r=curquiza a=irevoire

Reverts #4544

Fixes #4641

I didn’t realize that some http clients were not handling chunked http requests like you would expect (if you ask the body, it gives you the body), which made the previous PR breaking.

There is no way to provide a good fix to the issue we initially wanted to fix without breaking meilisearch and that’s not planned for now.

Co-authored-by: Tamo <irevoire@protonmail.ch>
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 21, 2024

Build failed:

@Kerollmops
Copy link
Member

Bors merge

Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented May 21, 2024

@meili-bors meili-bors bot merged commit abe2977 into main May 21, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@meili-bors meili-bors bot deleted the revert-4544-stream-documents branch May 21, 2024 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip changelog The PR will not appear in the release changelogs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

A lot of SDK CIs fail
3 participants